Nan says "It's art" so it cant possibly be porno..................................

Numbered editions of the Klara and Edda belly-dancing by Nan Goldin print in a 30″ x 40″ size from Goldin’s The Devil’s Playground are highly sought after by collectors and sell for thousands of dollars at high-end auction houses like Sotheby’s. (So folks, now you know why no one is being prosecuted over this nasty picture being made, owned or displayed)

The art markets desire to defend Goldin sickens us, and of course the "kings new clothes" spring to mind. Tracey Emmin says her unmade bed is art and shrieks "Idiot" at anyone who denys it what a bunch of fools they are that run the tate!

The "art set" denigrate anyone who "doesnt have the eye" but dont be supprised at this it is the oldest tool in the confidence tricksters book. These con men rely upon peoples vanity and desire to be "part of the in crowd"to seperate them from their money in the name of "art"


Though this seems a perfectly natural moment, the dark open hole of the girl’s vagina is harrowing, (who the fuck would take a picture like that in the first place?) our first thought is that she is about to be raped, or maybe is being raped already the "nasty amateur" porno style composition sure shows clear intent to exploit to me! So how can a porno shot be art worth thousands? Nan says it is, thats how.

and as long "nasty Nan" can rely upon mindless supporters like the cretin quoted below, she can continue to produce kiddie porn as long as she likes

"The Klara and Edda belly-dancing Nan Goldin photo has been exhibited numerous times at major art shows without any controversy. The photo shown here has been blurred slightly to avoid all the Nan Goldin haters out there who claim the Klara and Edda picture is child porn.

Sorry, but it really is art. It may not be your idea of art, but Nan Goldin is a highly respected photographer and artist"

If the self same image had been found on the hard drive of 50 year old guys PC (instead of being acredited to a "respected artist" who rest assured will litigate against any accuser) it would be rapidly condemed for being the the kiddie porn it clearly is and rightly so .
The Police have clearly been got at by the art market on this occasion shame on them.

As for the cretins argument that it has been exhibited numerous times : Simply because others were taken in by the ART CONMEN and no one complained does not make it right it is still porn.

Please Sir Elton get rid of this nasty image you can afford it, and it will be one less example of a childs nakedness and inocence being exploited for the benefit of adults I wonder how much of the cash the two little girls ever saw!