Why are heads NOT rolling at the BBC

Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand are both well paid “entertainers” with reputations they need to enhance and to that end they will brook no obstruction to their endeavors, in their pursuit of self aggrandizement. No matter that they see anyone they choose as “fair game” to be a target of their spiteful deprecating “humor”.

Such arrogance is bred from the constant servile attention to, and bolstering of, their idols fragile ego’s by a collection of worthless lackeys, agents, & broadcasters anxious to bathe in the reflected “glory” of being “close” to such a media glitterati.

Their offensive"spoof call" to a genuine "star" Andrew Sachs has clearly shown shown them to be the shallow, talentless clowns they actualy are, British people do not respond well to seeing others mocked.

Add to this the fact there are very strict rules on the conduct & language of “the general public” calling into chat shows, should they voice feelings that may offend others, should they be able to get past the bleep machine then you can be certain they will feel the strong arm of the law close around them very quickly indeed.

So the real question is HOW did this vile rant get broadcast in the first place? Brand and Ross should be made to issue prime time public apologies, then dismissed from their positions same day.

BUT we would like the person in charge of the program brought to book, and made to publicly explain why they thought this was acceptable broadcasting if they are unable to convince an independent jury they to should be got rid as well.

That might start to send out the message WE DON'T LIKE BULLY'S attacking genuine media Icon's and we don't want our license fee going to support them.

I used to think Jonathan Ross was quite amusing, no I think he is a self serving over paid over rated Bully. As for that useless heroin head Brand the most important thing he will ever achieve is death.