In an astonishing mix up Channel4 Last night screened the latest episode of "celebrity Wife Swap" and in a move that can only be described as "confused" featured Rhona Cameron and Her Lesbian lover as contestants.
Cameron is not a male so she simply cannot have a wife! (Not being married is also a bit of a stumbling block) so why did we have to put up with her miserable moosh on our screen for an hour?
To add a further insult to their viewers Channel4 proceeded to describe Cameron as a "Comedienne" !!!!
Given that the primary skill set of anyone wishing to be described as either Comedian or Comedienne is that of whit or humour we are at a loss to know why Channel4 decided to describe Cameron as a Comedienne for she clearly fails on all counts there.
So seeing as Cameron clearly Fails for not being Married and she is NO comic so why the hell was she on the show? perhaps the producer fancies her!
7 comments:
First of all You don't have to be Married on Celebrity Wife Swap! Ie Sam Fox (not married)and Freddie Starr, Pete Burns (Not Married at the time) and Razor Ruddock? Also you are so wrong about Rhona having been to her live shows she is one of the funniest female stand up comedians in Britain. I am one of thousands who think the same. Maybe its just that you don't understand intelligent humour. Rhona and her girlfriend came across wonderfully last night and I applaud them both.
Then the show is clearly misnamed, as for Pete Burns, Freddie Starr, and Sam Fox not being married! THAT is hardly a surprise! Yet we would take the view that none had anything valuable to contribute to the wider UK public
Razor Ruddock can be excused as he made over forty appearances for West Ham and was fine servant of a fine club, In addition his views of a Woman's place in the home were both valuable and educational for many viewers, especially those Women with a distorted sense of their own value and levels of empowerment.
Fortunately WE understand all kinds of humour, and is why we are able to give such an incisive view on the subject, and exactly why we found describing Cameron as a "Comedienne" so astonishing.
IF you wish to waste you money watching the tawdry efforts of Cameron that is your right, but please do not come here and try to make the claim she is a comedienne of standing when she is clearly NOT.
As for the performance of Cameron and Lover they came across as exactly what they are, a pair of lezzers who think eating organic food makes them something special!
You are clearly a woman hating homophobic! so your opinions are not respected by the majority of the informed intellegent population. Why didn't you mention Stan Boardman, at least Rhona is a credible working stand up comic, author, actress and television writer. He hasn't been heard of since the 80's and he acted like a sexist, male chauvinist, but he is ok in your book isn't he?
You are clearly neither informed or intelligent therefore your view is not valid.
However the tone of your post clearly indicates that you are a woman.
We are not misogynists or Homphobic as you claim we just like Women to be Women and Men to be exactly that Men.
What you "like" is not reality Human Beings, and even animals can be gay straight and even bisexual. Men can act Like woman and woman like men Who cares? The traditional roles forced upon men and women have evolved so that now we are equal members of the human race, with equal rights. By the way I am not a woman but a husband and father, who accepts everyone for who they are.
Stan Boardman is a great comedian who was driven off our screens by the same lesbian commissioning maffia that seem to think Rhona Cameron is funny.So get you facts right love
We care! The whole point of smugboard is to protest the lies & wishy washy false reality of the politicos & mass media on all subjects including issues of gender.
Homosexuality in animals IS a defect as they do not have the ability to interfere with the procreative process and if nature did not create its own norm such defective behaviour would ultimately lead to the extinction of any species that accepted it as the norm! do not forget that goes for humans as well.
As for your comments on equality just more wishy washy half baked nonsense I am afraid, the roles only got blurred because we allowed them too that is NOT the same thing as the natural selection of roles at all.
A husband and Father you may be, just remember children need strong role models to learn from, and some kind of androgenous motherfather or fathermother figure is NOT the best example for children to learn from.
Post a Comment